About This Network
The MacArthur Research Network on Law and Neuroscience examined multiple effects of modern neuroscience on criminal law and tried to make neuroscience accessible and beneficial to America’s courtrooms.
The Research Network addressed a focused set of problems in criminal justice:
- Mental States: Assessing probable mental states of defendants and witnesses, such as the defendant’s most likely state of mind when he committed a past bad act.
- Capacity: Assessing a defendant’s capacity for self-regulating his behavior or self-control.
- Evidence: Assessing whether, and if so how, various kinds of neuroscientific evidence should be admitted and evaluated in individual cases.
Within these categories, researchers conducted brain imaging and other studies to examine issues such as detecting deception; detecting recognition; cognitive and brain development in adolescents; and when neuroscientific evidence, such as fMRI brain scans, should and sometimes, importantly, should not be admissible in court. The Network represented a distinct second phase of a research initiative titled The Law and Neuroscience Project, which launched in 2007.
Publications
VIEW ALL PUBLICATIONS
Network Chair
Owen D. Jones
Vanderbilt University
Network Members
- Richard J. Bonnie (University of Virginia)
- BJ Casey (Yale University)
- Andre Davis Judge (U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit)
- David L. Faigman (University of California, Hastings)
- Morris Hoffman (District Court Judge, State of Colorado)
- Read Montague (Virginia Tech & University College, London)
- Stephen J. Morse (University of Pennsylvania)
- Marcus E. Raichle (Washington University)
- Jennifer Richeson (Yale University)
- Elizabeth Scott (Columbia University)
- Francis X. Shen (University of Minnesota)
- Laurence Steinberg (Temple University)
- Kim Taylor-Thompson (New York University)
- Anthony D. Wagner (Stanford University)
- Gideon Yaffe (Yale University)