Funded from 2007 to the present.
About This Network
The MacArthur Research Network on Law and Neuroscience is examining multiple effects of modern neuroscience on criminal law and trying to make neuroscience accessible and beneficial to America’s courtrooms.
The Research Network addresses a focused set of problems in criminal justice:
- Mental States: Assessing probable mental states of defendants and witnesses, such as the defendant’s most likely state of mind when he committed a past bad act.
- Capacity: Assessing a defendant’s capacity for self-regulating his behavior or self-control.
- Evidence: Assessing whether, and if so how, various kinds of neuroscientific evidence should be admitted and evaluated in individual cases.
Within these categories, researchers will conduct brain imaging and other studies to examine issues such as detecting deception; detecting recognition; cognitive and brain development in adolescents; and when neuroscientific evidence, such as fMRI brain scans, should and sometimes, importantly, should not be admissible in court. The Network represents a distinct second phase of a research initiative titled The Law and Neuroscience Project, which launched in 2007.
Owen D. Jones (Director)
Richard J. Bonnie
University of Virginia
Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
David L. Faigman
University of California, Hastings
District Court Judge, State of Colorado
Virginia Tech & University College, London
Stephen J. Morse
University of Pennsylvania
Marcus E. Raichle
Francis X. Shen
University of Minnesota
New York University
Anthony D. Wagner