Research Network on Law and Neuroscience

The MacArthur Research Network on Law and Neuroscience is examining multiple effects of modern neuroscience on criminal law and trying to make neuroscience accessible and beneficial to America’s courtrooms.

About This Network

The MacArthur Research Network on Law and Neuroscience is examining multiple effects of modern neuroscience on criminal law and trying to make neuroscience accessible and beneficial to America’s courtrooms.

The Research Network addresses a focused set of problems in criminal justice:

  • Mental States: Assessing probable mental states of defendants and witnesses, such as the defendant’s most likely state of mind when he committed a past bad act. 
  • Capacity: Assessing a defendant’s capacity for self-regulating his behavior or self-control.
  • Evidence: Assessing whether, and if so how, various kinds of neuroscientific evidence should be admitted and evaluated in individual cases.

Within these categories, researchers will conduct brain imaging and other studies to examine issues such as detecting deception; detecting recognition; cognitive and brain development in adolescents; and when neuroscientific evidence, such as fMRI brain scans, should and sometimes, importantly, should not be admissible in court. The Network represents a distinct second phase of a research initiative titled The Law and Neuroscience Project, which launched in 2007.

Network Members

Richard J. Bonnie
University of Virginia

BJ Casey
Cornell University

David L. Faigman
University of California, Hastings

Martha J. Farah
University of Pennsylvania

Stephen J. Morse
University of Pennsylvania

Morris Hoffman
Second Judicial District Court, State of Colorado

Read Montague
Virginia Tech & University College, London

Marcus E. Raichle
Washington University

Elizabeth Scott
Columbia University

Laurence Steinberg
Temple University

Anthony D. Wagner,
Stanford University

Gideon Yaffe
University of Southern California